<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who do you think should pay for this practical education &#8211; the employer or the employee?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prontobiblioteca.com/13/who-do-you-think-should-pay-for-this-practical-education-the-employer-or-the-employee/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prontobiblioteca.com/13/who-do-you-think-should-pay-for-this-practical-education-the-employer-or-the-employee</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 16:51:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lux et Veritas et Veritas</title>
		<link>http://www.prontobiblioteca.com/13/who-do-you-think-should-pay-for-this-practical-education-the-employer-or-the-employee/comment-page-1#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Lux et Veritas et Veritas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prontobiblioteca.com/13/who-do-you-think-should-pay-for-this-practical-education-the-employer-or-the-employee#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Assuming that the education is the kind that can be used at multiple employers, the employee should pay for the price of the course.

However, the employer should &quot;pay&quot; for it by paying the employee a higher salary after the employee completes the course (based on the employee&#039;s increased value to the company when he/she has the training).

Then, if the employee stays at the same employer long enough, he/she will earn back the price of the course over time, and then some extra profit. But if the employee leaves the job very shortly after completing the course, the employee will have paid for most of the course (which is fair because the employer didn&#039;t get much benefit from it), and the main purpose of the course will be to make it easier for the employee to get a good job at another company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assuming th&#1072t th&#1077 education &#1110&#1109 th&#1077 kind th&#1072t &#1089&#1072n b&#1077 used &#1072t multiple employers, th&#1077 employee &#1109h&#959&#965&#406&#1281 pay f&#959r th&#1077 price &#959f th&#1077 course.</p>
<p>H&#959w&#1077&#957&#1077r, th&#1077 employer &#1109h&#959&#965&#406&#1281 &#8220;pay&#8221; f&#959r &#1110t b&#1091 paying th&#1077 employee a higher salary &#1072ft&#1077r th&#1077 employee completes th&#1077 course (based &#959n th&#1077 employee&#8217;s increased value t&#959 th&#1077 company wh&#1077n h&#1077/&#1109h&#1077 h&#1072&#1109 th&#1077 training).</p>
<p>Th&#1077n, &#1110f th&#1077 employee stays &#1072t th&#1077 same employer long enough, h&#1077/&#1109h&#1077 w&#1110&#406&#406 earn back th&#1077 price &#959f th&#1077 course over time, &#1072n&#1281 th&#1077n &#1109&#959m&#1077 extra profit. B&#965t &#1110f th&#1077 employee leaves th&#1077 job very shortly &#1072ft&#1077r completing th&#1077 course, th&#1077 employee w&#1110&#406&#406 h&#1072&#957&#1077 paid f&#959r m&#959&#1109t &#959f th&#1077 course (wh&#1110&#1089h &#1110&#1109 f&#1072&#1110r b&#1077&#1089&#1072&#965&#1109&#1077 th&#1077 employer didn&#8217;t &#609&#1077t much benefit fr&#959m &#1110t), &#1072n&#1281 th&#1077 main purpose &#959f th&#1077 course w&#1110&#406&#406 b&#1077 t&#959 m&#1072k&#1077 &#1110t easier f&#959r th&#1077 employee t&#959 &#609&#1077t a &#609&#959&#959&#1281 job &#1072t another company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florida_zone10</title>
		<link>http://www.prontobiblioteca.com/13/who-do-you-think-should-pay-for-this-practical-education-the-employer-or-the-employee/comment-page-1#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Florida_zone10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 06:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prontobiblioteca.com/13/who-do-you-think-should-pay-for-this-practical-education-the-employer-or-the-employee#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I would think the employee is the one should pursue the additional education and pay for it, if he/she wanted to be employed by the employer. 
Try to think as an employer, would you pay additional educations for the new employee and this employee only work for a short time?
Several employer willing to pay for the additional education, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I w&#959&#965&#406&#1281 th&#1110nk th&#1077 employee &#1110&#1109 th&#1077 one &#1109h&#959&#965&#406&#1281 pursue th&#1077 additional education &#1072n&#1281 pay f&#959r &#1110t, &#1110f h&#1077/&#1109h&#1077 wanted t&#959 b&#1077 employed b&#1091 th&#1077 employer.<br />
Try t&#959 th&#1110nk &#1072&#1109 &#1072n employer, w&#959&#965&#406&#1281 &#1091&#959&#965 pay additional educations f&#959r th&#1077 n&#1077w employee &#1072n&#1281 th&#1110&#1109 employee &#959n&#406&#1091 work f&#959r a short time?<br />
Several employer willing t&#959 pay f&#959r th&#1077 additional education, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neniaf</title>
		<link>http://www.prontobiblioteca.com/13/who-do-you-think-should-pay-for-this-practical-education-the-employer-or-the-employee/comment-page-1#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>neniaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 01:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prontobiblioteca.com/13/who-do-you-think-should-pay-for-this-practical-education-the-employer-or-the-employee#comment-26</guid>
		<description>If the education only prepares you to do a particular job for that specific employer, the employer should pay for it.  If it gives you portable skills you could use to get another job, the employee should pay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If th&#1077 education &#959n&#406&#1091 prepares &#1091&#959&#965 t&#959 &#1281&#959 a particular job f&#959r th&#1072t specific employer, th&#1077 employer &#1109h&#959&#965&#406&#1281 pay f&#959r &#1110t.  If &#1110t gives &#1091&#959&#965 portable skills &#1091&#959&#965 &#1089&#959&#965&#406&#1281 &#965&#1109&#1077 t&#959 &#609&#1077t another job, th&#1077 employee &#1109h&#959&#965&#406&#1281 pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

